3/26/2023 0 Comments Invariant subspace definitionBut does this imply that 2-dimensional invariant subspaces can’t exist? It seems this would only necessarily follow if the answer to this post’s question is “yes.” Other opinions welcome. Definition 1 Let U V U V be a subspace of V V and T L ( V) T L ( V), then we call U U an invariant subspace when u U u U. It is quick to show that its only eigenspace is the one spanned by $(1,0,0)$ and that its only generalized eigenspace is all of $\mathbb R^3$ with eigenvalue $1$. From Invariant Subspace to Eigenspace We first give the definition of invariant subspace, and we will see the subspace spanned by single eigenvector is a special case of invariant subspace. 2), but I’m not sure about the other direction.įor context, I’m trying to decide whether $3\times 3$ matrices of the formĬan have any 2-dimensional invariant subspaces. The converse is true, which is the content of his Theorem 8.23 (in Ed. Given a subset A of G, the measure can be thought of as answering the question: what is the probability that a random element of G is in A It is a fact that this definition is equivalent to the definition in terms of L (G). I always refer to Sheldon Axler’s “Linear Algebra Done Right” for questions like this, but from what I can tell his theorems don’t answer this. This definition can be summarized thus: G is amenable if it has a finitely-additive left-invariant probability measure. Must $U$ also be the subspace associated with a generalized eigenvector of $T$ (which I call a “generalized eigenspace” in the post title)? I.e., must we have: SIAM Rev.Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional complex vector space and let $U$ be a subspace of $V$ invariant under the linear operator $T$: Stewart, G.W.: Error and perturbation bounds for subspaces associated with certain eigenvalue problems. 59(3), 695–720 (2019)ĭavis, C., Kahan, W.M.: The rotation of eigenvectors by a perturbation. 39(4), 1547–1563 (2018)ĭiao, H.-A., Meng, Q.-L.: Structured generalized eigenvalue condition numbers for parameterized quasiseparable matrices. Xu, W., Pang, H.-K., Li, W., Huang, X., Guo, W.: On the explicit expression of chordal metric between generalized singular values of Grassmann matrix pairs with applications. Sun, J.-G.: Matrix Perturbation Analysis. The space V is said to be the direct sum of V 1 ::: V k if 1Actually, we have a slight inconsistency if V 0 f0 V g. Li, H., Wei, Y.: Improved rigorous perturbation bounds for the LU and QR factorizations. So any subspace of the kernel of a linear transformation T2L(V V) will be an invariant subspace.1 Definition 18.3. Higham, D.J., Higham, N.J.: Structured backward error and condition of generalized eigenvalue problems. 16(4), 1328–1340 (1995)įrayssé, V., Toumazou, V.: A note on the normwise perturbation theory for the regular generalized eigenproblem. Sun, J.-G.: Perturbation bounds for the generalized Schur decomposition. Konstantinov, M., Petkov, P.H., Christov, N.: Nonlocal perturbation analysis of the Schur system of a matrix. Petkov, P.H.: Componentwise perturbation analysis of the Schur decomposition of a matrix. 50(1), 41–58 (2010)Ĭhen, X.S., Li, W., Ng, M.K.: Perturbation analysis for antitriangular Schur decomposition. 56(5), 967–982 (2013)Ĭhen, X.S.: Perturbation bounds for the periodic Schur decomposition. Control 34(7), 745–751 (1989)ĭiao, H., Shi, X., Wei, Y.: Effective condition numbers and small sample statistical condition estimation for the generalized Sylvester equation. Kagstrom, B., Westin, L.: Generalized Schur methods with condition estimators for solving the generalized Sylvester equation. Zhou, B., Duan, G.-R.: Solutions to generalized Sylvester matrix equation by Schur decomposition. Laub, A.: A Schur method for solving algebraic Riccati equations. Stewart, G.W., Sun, J.-G.: Matrix Perturbation Theory. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (2013) Golub, G.H., Van Loan, C.F.: Matrix Computations, 4th edn.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |